A Divided Future: Why Florida State and Clemson Could Leave the ACC and How Superconferences Threaten College Athletics

The landscape of college athletics is at a pivotal juncture. The potential departure of two of the Atlantic Coast Conference’s (ACC) most valuable members – Florida State University and Clemson University – casts a long shadow over the future of the conference and the sport itself. This blog post delves into the complex reasons behind this potential exodus, exploring the financial disparity, dwindling competitiveness, and the allure of bigger conferences like the Big Ten and SEC, while also highlighting the detrimental effects that superconferences with limited regional coherence can have on the college athletics ecosystem.

Financial Disparity: A Growing Divide

At the heart of the dissatisfaction lies a stark financial disparity within the ACC. The current television revenue sharing model, which distributes funds equally among all members, fails to account for the varying levels of athletic success and viewership. This system disproportionately benefits schools with lower athletic profiles, leaving powerhouses like Florida State and Clemson feeling financially undervalued.

A 2023 Knight Commission report revealed a significant gap in revenue generation. While Florida State and Clemson combined generated $183 million, the bottom six ACC schools collectively earned only $78 million. Despite this difference, the conference’s television deal, which stands at around $42 million annually, is shared equally, creating a sense of unfairness and hindering the growth of the top programs.

Dwindling Competitiveness: A Struggle for Relevance

The ACC’s historic dominance in football has waned in recent years, failing to produce a College Football Playoff (CFP) champion since Florida State in 2014. This decline in competitiveness has negatively impacted the conference’s prestige, viewership, and ultimately, its finances.

For programs like Florida State and Clemson, national success is paramount. However, competing within the ACC currently presents a significant obstacle. The lack of consistent high-caliber competition hinders their ability to showcase their talent on a national stage and potentially reach the CFP. This limitation ultimately restricts their potential and hinders their recruiting efforts.

The Allure of the Big Ten and SEC: A Bigger Stage Beckons

The rise of superconferences like the Big Ten and SEC has significantly altered the college athletics landscape. These conferences boast lucrative television deals, strong academic reputations, and national brands, making them highly attractive to top athletic programs. Recent aggressive expansions, including the additions of Texas and Oklahoma, further demonstrate their commitment to dominance.

For Florida State and Clemson, the allure of these superconferences is undeniable. Joining the Big Ten or SEC would provide them with access to:

• Larger television audiences: This translates to increased revenue and national exposure, enhancing their brand and attracting top recruits.
• Stronger competition: Playing against other elite programs on a regular basis would elevate their level of play and provide valuable preparation for future national championship runs.
• Increased athletic revenue: This would allow them to invest further in their athletic programs, attracting and retaining top talent and coaches.

These factors represent a significant upgrade from the current situation within the ACC, making the prospect of joining a superconference highly appealing.

Beyond the Finances: The Lack of Regional Coherence in Superconferences

While the financial benefits are undeniable, the emergence of superconferences raises concerns about the future of college athletics. The disregard for traditional regional rivalries and the creation of geographically disjointed conferences can have several detrimental effects:

• Diminished fan engagement: Loyal fans who have supported their teams for generations may feel alienated by the lack of regional connection and the emphasis on national brands over local rivalries.
• Reduced travel opportunities: Students and fans alike may find it more difficult and expensive to travel to away games, further impacting fan engagement and school spirit.
• Loss of local identity: The unique culture and traditions of individual universities can be overshadowed by the homogenization of superconferences, fostering a sense of disconnect and diminishing the special atmosphere that surrounds college athletics.
• Impact on student-athletes: Long travel times and the pressure to compete in a highly commercialized environment can negatively impact the academic and personal development of student-athletes.

These concerns highlight the need for a more balanced approach to conference realignment, one that acknowledges the importance of regional rivalries and maintains the unique identities of individual universities.

The potential departures of Florida State and Clemson from the ACC are further fueled by the controversial exclusion of Florida State from the 2023 College Football Playoff (CFP). This unexpected snub, despite the Seminoles finishing the regular season undefeated and winning the ACC championship, sent shockwaves through the college football world and ignited a firestorm of debate.

Here’s a breakdown of the controversy surrounding Florida State’s exclusion:

Unprecedented Exclusion:

• Florida State became the first undefeated Power Five conference champion to ever miss out on the CFP field. This unprecedented decision shattered historical norms and sparked questions about the selection committee’s criteria and priorities.

Strength of Schedule:

• The CFP committee argued that Florida State’s strength of schedule was not strong enough, particularly due to a weak ACC. However, many analysts and fans pointed out that the Seminoles defeated two ranked opponents, including a dominant victory over then-No. 5 Clemson in the ACC championship game.

Unconvincing Explanations:

• The committee’s justifications for excluding Florida State were deemed unconvincing by many. Some argued that the committee’s focus on strength of schedule was arbitrary and inconsistent when applied to other teams, while others felt the committee was unfairly penalizing Florida State for playing in a weaker conference.

Fan Outrage and Loss of Confidence:

• The exclusion of Florida State sparked widespread outrage among fans and media figures. Many felt the decision was unjust and questioned the legitimacy of the CFP selection process. This controversy further eroded public trust in the CFP and its ability to select the best teams for the national championship.

Increased Momentum for Conference Realignment:

• The Florida State snub fueled the already existing momentum for conference realignment. This controversy provided further evidence of the limitations that the ACC presents for its most successful programs, making the prospect of joining a more powerful conference like the Big Ten or SEC even more appealing for Florida State and Clemson.

Call for Reform:

• The 2023 CFP controversy has led to calls for reform of the selection process. Many propose a more transparent and objective system that considers a wider range of factors beyond just strength of schedule. This includes metrics like head-to-head record, margin of victory, and quality wins, which could help to prevent similar injustices in the future.

The exclusion of Florida State from the 2023 CFP serves as a case study in the challenges facing college athletics. It highlights the increasing importance of financial resources and national exposure, while also raising concerns about the potential homogenization and loss of regional identity within a superconference dominated landscape. As the future of college athletics unfolds, finding a balance between financial viability, athletic competition, and the unique traditions that make college sports special will be paramount.

A Crossroads for College Athletics

The potential departures of Florida State and Clemson stand as a stark reminder of the changing landscape of college athletics. While financial considerations play a significant role, the desire for greater national relevance and the lack of competitive parity within the ACC are equally important factors driving their contemplation of leaving.

The emergence of superconferences presents both opportunities and challenges. While they can provide financial benefits and increased national exposure, they also risk diminishing the unique traditions and fan engagement that have always been at the heart of college athletics. As the college athletics landscape continues to evolve, it is crucial to find a balance between financial sustainability

---

This blog is an example of how to use current events and AI to draft a biased document to ask students to respond with a personal argument. While the topic may seem benign it could create interest among students.

This is part of my Politics in the Classroom series, where I look at the importance of political campaigns, pop culture, sports, music, and geopolitics of the last 50 years and how to use them as resources in the classroom. To read more, check out my other posts in the series. (Link)