Part 1 of 3: The Foundation for Change
Why Current Conference Structures Are Unsustainable in the New Era of College Athletics
College athletics stands at the most consequential crossroads in its history. The June 2025 approval of the landmark House v NCAA settlement, combined with mounting evidence of student-athlete welfare deterioration due to excessive travel, has created a perfect storm demanding fundamental conference realignment. What emerges isn’t just an opportunity for change—it’s an imperative that will determine whether college sports can maintain their educational mission while adapting to economic realities.
The House Settlement: A Financial Revolution
The Death of Amateurism
On June 6, 2025, Judge Claudia Wilken approved the $2.8 billion House v NCAA settlement, officially ending what CBS Sports’ Brandon Marcello called “the NCAA’s 119-year amateurism model.” The settlement creates unprecedented financial obligations and opportunities that current conference structures cannot accommodate.
Revenue Sharing Requirements: Starting July 1, 2025, schools can directly pay student-athletes up to $22 million annually through revenue sharing. The revenue-sharing cap will increase by at least 4% each year during the 10-year agreement, potentially reaching $32.9 million by the agreement’s end.
Distribution Formula Crisis: The settlement’s allocation heavily favors revenue-generating sports: 75% to football players, 15% to men’s basketball players, 5% to women’s basketball players, and 5% for all other sports combined. This creates massive pressure on athletic departments to maximize football and basketball revenue while potentially eliminating Olympic sports programs.
Backpay Obligations: The $2.8 billion in back payments for athletes who competed between 2016 and 2024 creates immediate financial strain. Power Five football and basketball players will receive an average of $135,000 over 10 years, representing unprecedented cash outflows for athletic departments.
The Olympic Sports Crisis
The settlement’s most devastating impact falls on non-revenue sports. Research shows that more than 900 Division I athletic opportunities have been eliminated since House settlement discussions began. Former Penn State president Eric Barron declared this “a tragedy,” but it’s only the beginning.
Sydney Moore, attending AthleteCon when the settlement was approved, captured the stark reality: “A lot of us would much rather know that our resources and our experience as a student-athlete is going to stay the same, or possibly get better, rather than be given 3,000 dollars, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle braces because we don’t have any, and the athletic training room isn’t stocked.”
Financial Pressure Points:
- Some Olympic sports programs will receive zero revenue sharing
- Equipment, medical, and travel budgets face cuts to fund revenue sharing
- Scholarship reductions and roster limits threaten program viability
- Academic support services may be eliminated to redirect funds
New Oversight and Compliance Costs
The settlement establishes unprecedented oversight mechanisms that create additional financial burdens:
College Sports Commission: A new organization tasked with settlement oversight and rule enforcement, requiring member contributions and compliance infrastructure.
Technology Requirements: Schools must pay Deloitte between $5,000 and $500,000 annually for software monitoring NIL deals and revenue-sharing contracts through “NIL Go” clearinghouse systems.
Enhanced Reporting: All NIL deals over $600 require detailed reporting and potential arbitration processes, creating administrative costs and legal exposure.
The Student-Athlete Welfare Crisis
Travel Burden Documentation
Five years of expanded conference geographic footprints have produced irrefutable evidence of negative impacts on student-athlete welfare. Research by Amanda Paule-Koba at Bowling Green State University documents that “longer trips and travel times equate to an increase in time away from campus, missed classes and jet lag. These increases have been shown to have a negative effect on academic performance and the athlete’s physical and mental health.”
Real-World Impact Examples
Stanford Women’s Soccer: Nya Harrison, a Stanford women’s soccer player, emphasized that “sports like women’s soccer were an afterthought in the decision to change conferences.” The Cardinal’s move from the Pac-12 to the ACC means regular cross-country travel for all sports, not just football.
UCLA’s Big Ten Experience: UCLA’s athletic department documented higher levels of fatigue and soreness through GPS wearables and readiness surveys. Men’s basketball coach Mick Cronin didn’t mince words: “We have to go back [East] four times. Oh, the Big Ten teams get to come to Los Angeles where it’s 70 degrees one time a year.”
Oregon State Baseball Crisis: The Beavers played only 19 games at home this season due to conference dissolution and scheduling challenges. Coach Mitch Canham noted the impact: “A lot of the options were conferences that typically get one bid into the postseason. And that’s not the level we want for our program or our players.”
Mental Health Consequences
The 2023 NCAA student-athlete health and wellness study found that 67% of participants in women’s sports wished coaches and administrators talked more about mental wellness. The added stress of extensive travel, missed classes, and disrupted routines compounds existing mental health challenges.
Stanford’s Harrison, who lost teammate Katie Meyer to suicide, reflected: “Dealing with that death, with such a close teammate, just struck me in a hard way and also made me self-reflect and realize how much of an impact being a student-athlete actually has on us.”
Academic Performance Deterioration
Missed Class Time: Conference realignment has “redefined the term ‘travel ball,’ doubling and in some cases tripling conference travel for less visible sports, none more so than women’s volleyball, whose players will spend the most time on airplanes, miss the most classes and deal with the most fatigue and jet lag.”
Time Zone Challenges: Research by sleep specialists shows that traveling east can have adverse impacts on athletic performance because advancing the body clock is more difficult than delaying it. This affects both competitive performance and academic engagement.
Study Time Reduction: Extended travel days reduce available study time and disrupt established academic routines, forcing student-athletes to choose between athletic commitments and educational success.
Financial Inequality and Conference Instability
The Revenue Gap Widens
Current conference revenue disparities have become unsustainable in light of House settlement obligations:
Big Ten/SEC Advantage: Both conferences will distribute $100+ million annually per school by 2030, providing massive advantages in revenue sharing capabilities and facility investments.
ACC Financial Trap: Schools locked into ESPN deals through 2036 at $40-50 million annually cannot compete financially with super-conferences, creating pressure for departure despite Grant of Rights agreements.
Mid-Tier Conference Struggles: Big 12 schools at $50-55 million annually can compete regionally but lack resources for national championship consistently.
Geographic Impossibility
The Atlantic Coast Conference’s coast-to-coast expansion exemplifies the unsustainable geographic extremes current realignment has created:
Travel Cost Explosion: Ohio State spent $10.7 million on travel expenses in 2017. Multiply this across expanded conference footprints, and the financial strain becomes overwhelming.
Academic Mission Compromise: Prestigious institutions like Stanford and Cal are forced to prioritize television revenue over educational compatibility, creating fundamental conflicts with institutional missions.
Competitive Disadvantage: Teams forced into excessive travel face documented performance decreases, creating unfair competitive environments within conferences.
The Cultural and Traditional Casualties
Lost Rivalries
Conference realignment has destroyed century-old rivalries in favor of television markets:
- Stanford-Cal “Big Game” lost its conference significance
- Regional rivalries like Pittsburgh-West Virginia “Backyard Brawl” eliminated
- Natural geographic competitors separated by artificial conference boundaries
Academic Partnership Disruption
Universities with complementary research missions and academic cultures have been separated by conference realignment focused solely on athletic revenue, reducing opportunities for academic collaboration and shared educational initiatives.
Community Impact
Local and regional fan bases struggle with increased travel costs and reduced accessibility to away games, diminishing the community connection that makes college sports culturally significant.
Technological and Enforcement Challenges
NIL Monitoring Complexity
The House settlement’s NIL oversight requirements create technological and administrative burdens that smaller athletic departments cannot efficiently manage:
Software Costs: Deloitte’s monitoring systems cost between $5,000 and $500,000 annually per school, creating additional financial strain.
Arbitration Processes: New dispute resolution mechanisms require legal expertise and administrative infrastructure that many schools lack.
Compliance Complexity: Monitoring deals over $600 while determining “fair market value” creates subjective enforcement challenges.
Administrative Burden
The combination of revenue sharing, enhanced NIL oversight, and travel coordination across massive geographic footprints creates administrative costs that reduce resources available for actual educational and athletic programs.
The Imperative for Change
Financial Sustainability Crisis
Current conference structures cannot accommodate the financial demands of the House settlement while maintaining educational missions and student-athlete welfare. Schools face impossible choices between competitive athletics and institutional integrity.
Student-Athlete Welfare Emergency
Documented evidence of academic, physical, and mental health deterioration due to excessive travel demands immediate action. The current trajectory threatens the fundamental premise that college athletics serve educational purposes.
Competitive Integrity Concerns
Massive revenue disparities and geographic disadvantages create fundamentally unfair competitive environments that undermine the integrity of college athletics competition.
Academic Mission Conflict
The tension between educational missions and athletic revenue demands has reached a breaking point, forcing institutions to compromise core values for financial survival.
The Path Forward
The confluence of House settlement financial pressures, documented student-athlete welfare deterioration, and unsustainable conference structures demands comprehensive realignment that prioritizes:
- Financial Sustainability: Conference structures that allow schools to meet House settlement obligations while maintaining educational missions
- Geographic Sanity: Regional alignments that minimize travel while preserving meaningful rivalries and cultural connections
- Competitive Balance: Revenue distribution that enables legitimate competition while acknowledging different institutional priorities
- Academic Alignment: Conference membership that supports rather than undermines educational missions and research collaboration
- Student-Athlete Welfare: Structures that prioritize academic success, mental health, and overall welfare over pure revenue maximization
Conclusion: The Foundation for Necessary Change
The House settlement and student-athlete welfare crisis have created conditions that make current conference structures untenable. The evidence is overwhelming: excessive travel harms academic performance and mental health, financial pressures threaten Olympic sports and educational missions, and geographic impossibilities create unsustainable operational challenges.
The choice facing college athletics isn’t between stability and change—current structures are inherently unstable and deteriorating rapidly. The choice is between managed, strategic realignment that serves all stakeholders or chaotic collapse that serves none.
In Part 2 of this series, we’ll examine how the Atlantic Coast Conference’s structural problems exemplify these challenges and why strategic dissolution represents the best path forward. Part 3 will detail specific realignment scenarios that address the fundamental issues identified here while creating sustainable, regionally coherent conferences capable of thriving in the post-House settlement era.
The foundation for change is clear. The question now is whether college athletics leadership will act strategically to address these challenges or allow market forces to create chaos that ultimately destroys what makes college sports educationally and culturally valuable.
Coming Next: Part 2 – “The ACC’s Impossible Geography: Why Coast-to-Coast Conferences Cannot Survive” will examine the specific structural problems facing the Atlantic Coast Conference and why strategic dissolution offers the best solution for member institutions and college athletics overall.
BFWClassroom 