When Eastern Europe United Against the Red Tide

The aftermath of World War I left Eastern Europe fractured and vulnerable, with newly independent nations struggling to defend themselves against both German revanchism and Russian Bolshevik expansion. The Polish-Soviet War of 1919-1921 demonstrated both the Bolshevik threat and the potential for successful resistance. But what if the scattered resistance had been coordinated from the beginning? What if East Prussia, Poland, and Lithuania had formed a unified military confederation in 1919, creating a barrier against Bolshevik westward expansion that might have altered the entire trajectory of 20th-century European history?

The Point of Departure: The Königsberg Conference, March 1919

In our timeline, the new nations of Eastern Europe faced the Bolshevik threat largely in isolation, with sporadic cooperation hampered by mutual suspicions and competing territorial claims. But imagine if events had unfolded differently following a chance encounter between three remarkable military leaders in the East Prussian capital of Königsberg.

General Józef Piłsudski, the architect of Polish independence, finds himself in Königsberg in March 1919 for negotiations over Polish access to the Baltic Sea. There he encounters General Antanas Smetona of Lithuania and, unexpectedly, General Georg von der Goltz, commander of German Freikorps units still operating in the Baltic region despite the armistice.

The meeting, initially tense given their wartime enmities, is transformed by disturbing intelligence reports from the east. Bolshevik forces under Mikhail Tukhachevsky are massing for a massive westward offensive designed to “carry the revolution on the points of bayonets” to Germany. The three commanders realize that their individual forces cannot withstand the coming assault, but united they might create an impregnable barrier.

Von der Goltz, whose Freikorps has been operating semi-independently in East Prussia, makes a startling proposal: rather than fighting each other over territorial disputes, why not create a confederation that could defend the entire region against Bolshevism while preserving each nation’s essential interests?

The Königsberg Pact: An Unlikely Alliance

The resulting agreement, signed on March 15, 1919, creates the “Baltic Defense League”—a military confederation uniting Polish forces, Lithuanian armies, and German Freikorps under unified command. The pact includes several revolutionary provisions:

Unified Command Structure: Piłsudski assumes supreme command, with Smetona commanding the northern sector and von der Goltz leading German units under Polish authority—a remarkable reversal of traditional German-Polish relationships.

Territorial Compromise: East Prussia remains under German administration but accepts Polish access to the sea through the “Danzig Corridor,” while Lithuania gains access to Königsberg port facilities. Territorial disputes are deferred until the Bolshevik threat is eliminated.

Resource Sharing: German industrial capacity in East Prussia provides weapons and supplies for Polish and Lithuanian forces, while Poland contributes manpower and Lithuania provides crucial intelligence networks.

International Recognition: The alliance actively seeks Western support by positioning itself as the defender of European civilization against Bolshevik barbarism.

The Red Army Offensive: Spring 1919

The Bolshevik offensive begins in April 1919 with Tukhachevsky’s Western Front launching a massive assault designed to break through to Germany and ignite world revolution. In our timeline, this offensive nearly succeeded, reaching the outskirts of Warsaw before being turned back. But the Baltic Defense League creates an entirely different strategic situation.

Instead of facing divided, competing forces, the Red Army encounters a coordinated defense in depth. Polish forces, reinforced by German artillery and Lithuanian cavalry, establish defensive positions along the Bug River while mobile reserves prepare for counterattack.

The key innovation proves to be the “Königsberg Strategy”—using East Prussia’s rail network to rapidly shift forces between threatened sectors. When Tukhachevsky attempts to break through in the center, Baltic Defense League forces execute a massive flanking maneuver that encircles significant Red Army units near Grodno.

By summer 1919, the unified command has not only stopped the Bolshevik offensive but launched a counteroffensive that pushes Soviet forces back beyond the Dnieper River. The success attracts international attention and begins shifting Western attitudes toward the Eastern European situation.

The Cascade Effect: Western Support and Regional Transformation

The Baltic Defense League’s success against the Red Army transforms Western perceptions of Eastern Europe. Instead of viewing the region as chaotic and unreliable, Britain and France begin seeing it as a crucial barrier against Bolshevism.

French Military Support: Marshal Ferdinand Foch, impressed by the League’s military effectiveness, arranges for significant French military aid, including modern artillery, aircraft, and military advisors. This support proves crucial in subsequent campaigns.

British Naval Cooperation: The Royal Navy, seeking to contain Bolshevism, establishes close cooperation with the League, providing naval support in the Baltic and helping to break the Soviet naval blockade.

American Recognition: The United States, despite its growing isolationism, recognizes the Baltic Defense League as a legitimate government and provides humanitarian aid to refugee populations.

The international support enables the League to launch a major offensive in late 1919 that liberates significant portions of Belarus and Ukraine. Local populations, exhausted by Bolshevik policies, often welcome the League forces as liberators.

The German Question: Von der Goltz’s Gambit

The most complex aspect of the Baltic Defense League involves the role of German forces under von der Goltz. His Freikorps, officially disbanded under the Versailles Treaty, operates under the fiction of being “volunteers” serving the League.

Von der Goltz proves remarkably adaptable to the new situation. Rather than pursuing traditional German imperial aims, he positions himself as a defender of European Christian civilization against Bolshevik atheism. His forces become genuinely integrated into the League structure, with German officers serving under Polish and Lithuanian commanders.

This integration has profound consequences for German political development. The success of German-Polish-Lithuanian cooperation undermines nationalist narratives about inevitable ethnic conflict. When the Weimar Republic faces political crisis, the Baltic model provides an alternative to both communist revolution and right-wing reaction.

The Ukrainian Liberation: 1920-1921

The League’s greatest triumph comes with the liberation of Ukraine in 1920-1921. Working with Ukrainian nationalist forces under Symon Petliura, the Baltic Defense League launches a coordinated offensive that drives Soviet forces from Kiev and establishes an independent Ukrainian state.

The Ukrainian campaign demonstrates the League’s evolution from defensive alliance to liberation movement. Local populations across the former Russian Empire begin viewing the League as a genuine alternative to both Bolshevik tyranny and traditional imperial rule.

The Polish-Ukrainian Alliance: Poland’s cooperation with Ukrainian independence movements reverses centuries of conflict between the two peoples, creating a powerful bloc stretching from the Baltic to the Black Sea.

The Lithuanian Renaissance: Lithuania’s participation in the liberation campaigns transforms it from a small, isolated nation into a key player in Eastern European affairs.

German Redemption: The Freikorps units’ role in liberating oppressed peoples provides an alternative narrative to German defeat and humiliation, influencing domestic German politics.

Long-term Consequences: A Different Interwar Period

The success of the Baltic Defense League fundamentally alters the trajectory of interwar European politics:

Soviet Isolation: The loss of Ukraine and Belarus, combined with the League’s continued military pressure, forces the Soviet Union into genuine isolation. Stalin’s “Socialism in One Country” becomes necessity rather than choice.

German Democratic Stability: The success of German-Polish cooperation undermines extremist narratives on both sides. The Weimar Republic, supported by the Baltic success story, proves more resilient against both communist and Nazi challenges.

French Security: France, no longer fearing German-Russian cooperation, can focus on Western European integration rather than maintaining the “cordon sanitaire” in Eastern Europe.

British Imperial Strategy: With Eastern Europe stabilized, Britain can concentrate resources on maintaining its global empire rather than worrying about European balance-of-power issues.

The Avoided World War: 1930s-1940s

The most profound consequence of the Baltic Defense League’s success is the prevention of World War II as we know it:

No Nazi Rise: German participation in the successful League undermines Nazi appeals to nationalism and revanchism. Hitler remains a marginal figure in German politics, never gaining the support necessary for power.

No Soviet Expansion: The USSR, contained within its 1922 borders and facing continued pressure from the League, cannot pursue the aggressive expansion that characterized Stalin’s later policies.

No Appeasement Crisis: Without Nazi Germany threatening Western Europe, there is no Munich Crisis, no invasion of Poland, and no general European war.

Alternative Conflicts: While avoiding world war, the period sees continued low-level conflicts as the Baltic Defense League gradually expands its influence eastward, eventually encompassing most of the former Russian Empire.

The Cold War That Never Was

By 1945, the world looks fundamentally different. Instead of a bipolar confrontation between the United States and Soviet Union, global politics is characterized by multiple power centers:

The Atlantic Democratic Alliance: Britain, France, and the United States maintain close cooperation but face no existential communist threat.

The Baltic Confederation: The original Defense League evolves into a full confederation encompassing Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, East Prussia, Ukraine, and Belarus—a major European power in its own right.

The Isolated Soviet Union: Reduced to the Russian heartland, the USSR remains communist but lacks the resources or influence to challenge Western democracy globally.

The Asian Balance: Without European distraction, Britain and America can focus on containing Japanese expansion, potentially preventing Pearl Harbor and the Pacific War.

Challenges and Limitations

Even this successful Baltic Defense League faces significant challenges:

Ethnic Tensions: The confederation must constantly manage tensions between Poles, Lithuanians, Germans, Ukrainians, and Belarusians, requiring innovative federal structures and minority protections.

Economic Development: Integrating diverse economic systems while maintaining military readiness strains the confederation’s resources and requires ongoing Western support.

Religious Differences: Catholic Poland, Protestant East Prussia, Orthodox Ukraine, and mixed Lithuania must find common ground despite centuries of religious conflict.

Succession Questions: As founding leaders like Piłsudski age and die, the confederation faces challenges in maintaining unity and common purpose.

The American Connection: Roosevelt and Truman’s Alternative

In this alternate timeline, American foreign policy develops along different lines. Franklin Roosevelt, without a European war to focus attention, concentrates on domestic New Deal programs and gradual involvement in Pacific affairs.

When Harry Truman assumes the presidency in 1945 (following Roosevelt’s death from natural causes rather than wartime stress), he inherits a world where American leadership is desired but not desperately needed. The Baltic Confederation provides a model for successful international cooperation that influences Truman’s approach to post-war reconstruction and international organization.

Truman’s “Fair Deal” domestic programs receive more attention in this timeline, while his international focus shifts toward supporting successful democratic confederations like the Baltic League rather than containing an existential communist threat.

Conclusion: The Path of Cooperation

The story of the Baltic Defense League represents one of history’s great “what ifs”—the possibility that cooperation could triumph over the ethnic nationalism and ideological extremism that characterized the 20th century.

This alternate history suggests that the catastrophes of the period were not inevitable—that creative leadership, international support, and willingness to subordinate narrow nationalism to broader cooperation could have created a fundamentally different world.

The Baltic model demonstrates how military necessity can create political innovation, transforming traditional enemies into allies and creating new forms of international organization. The confederation’s success in containing Bolshevism while avoiding the excesses of fascism provides a template for addressing contemporary challenges requiring international cooperation.

The lesson remains relevant: when facing existential threats, former enemies can become effective allies if they can subordinate historical grievances to common cause. The Baltic Defense League’s success suggests that with creative leadership and international support, even the most intractable conflicts can be transformed into cooperation.

---

Primary Historical Evidence

• Piłsudski’s Military Correspondence: Documentation of his strategic thinking about Baltic cooperation and his evolving views on German-Polish relations
• Freikorps Unit Records: German military documents showing the actual capabilities and political orientation of von der Goltz’s forces in East Prussia
• Lithuanian State Archives: Records of early independence period showing interest in regional military cooperation
• British Foreign Office Baltic Files: Documentation of Western attitudes toward Eastern European confederation possibilities

Academic Sources

• “Bismarck’s War: The Franco-Prussian War and the Making of Modern Europe” by Rachel Chrastil (2023) – Analysis of German strategic thinking and the precedents for German-Eastern European cooperation that informed this scenario
• “The Ascent to Power: How Truman Emerged from Roosevelt’s Shadow and Remade the World” by David L. Roll (2024) – Insights into alternative American foreign policy approaches that might have developed without the Cold War
• “The Polish-Soviet War 1919-1920” by Adam Zamoyski – Essential background on the actual military campaigns that provide the foundation for this alternate history
• “The Baltic Revolution” by Anatol Lieven – Analysis of Baltic independence movements and their potential for regional cooperation

Reference Works

• “The Cambridge History of Poland”: “The Second Republic” – Standard coverage of Polish interwar foreign policy and military strategy
• “Encyclopedia of World War I”: “Eastern Front 1919-1921” – Comprehensive reference covering the post-war conflicts in Eastern Europe
• “The Oxford Handbook of German History”: Analysis of Freikorps activities and their potential political evolution

Historical Context Sources

• “The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914” by Christopher Clark – Background on Eastern European nationalism and the potential for alternative developments
• “Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin” by Timothy Snyder – Analysis of the region that the Baltic Defense League might have protected from totalitarian control
• “The Polish Way” by Adam Zamoyski – Cultural and political background on Polish approaches to international cooperation
• “The Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania” by Romuald Misiunas – Analysis of Baltic independence movements and regional cooperation possibilities

---

This alternative history was inspired by Rachel Chrastil’s analysis of German strategic thinking in “Bismarck’s War” and David L. Roll’s examination of alternative American foreign policy approaches in “The Ascent to Power,” suggesting how creative military cooperation in Eastern Europe might have fundamentally altered the trajectory of 20th-century international relations.

While these events are not true they are based on historic fact and the possibility of one change in history. To read more of my Alternate History scenarios, be sure read here.