A Personal Journey Through Two Revolutionary Landscapes – 250 Years of Legacy and 233 Years of Statehood

Growing up in South Carolina, I learned about the Revolutionary War through the lens of Southern battlefields, partisan warfare, and the complex dynamics of a society divided between patriots and loyalists. Names like Kings Mountain, Cowpens, and Francis Marion’s swamp campaigns shaped my understanding of how the Revolution unfolded in the Carolina backcountry. But since moving to Kentucky, I’ve discovered an entirely different dimension of Revolutionary history—one that extends beyond traditional battlefields to encompass the very naming of communities and the westward expansion of revolutionary ideals.

As spring turns to summer in 2025, living in Lexington, Kentucky, I find myself at the intersection of two momentous anniversaries that illuminate the enduring power of revolutionary ideals and American expansion. This year marks the 250th anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord that ignited the American Revolution, while June 1st celebrates the 233rd anniversary of Kentucky’s admission to the Union as the fifteenth state. These twin commemorations reveal how the spirit of 1775 spread from a Massachusetts village to the Kentucky frontier, creating connections between distant places through shared ideals of liberty and self-determination—connections I never fully appreciated during my Carolina upbringing.

Two Revolutionary Experiences: From Carolina Campaigns to Kentucky Frontiers

My South Carolina childhood was steeped in stories of Revolutionary War battles fought in familiar landscapes. We visited battlefields like Kings Mountain and Cowpens, where I could walk the actual ground where patriots and British forces clashed. The Revolution in South Carolina was visceral and immediate—you could see the bullet holes in church walls, visit the graveyards of fallen soldiers, and hear tales passed down through generations about ancestors who fought with Francis Marion or served under Daniel Morgan.

But Kentucky’s Revolutionary War story operates on a different level entirely. Here, the Revolution wasn’t about dramatic charges or partisan raids hidden in cypress swamps. Instead, it was about something more subtle yet equally profound: the power of revolutionary ideals to inspire naming, settlement, and community building hundreds of miles from the nearest battlefield. Living in Lexington, Kentucky, I’ve come to understand how the Revolution was not just a series of military conflicts but a transformative idea that traveled westward with every pioneer who carried news of liberty into the wilderness.

The Name That Binds Two Lexingtons Across Space and Time

The story of Lexington, Kentucky, begins not in the rolling Bluegrass region where I now live, but in the urgent news that traveled westward from Massachusetts in the spring of 1775. In early June of 1775, a party of frontiersmen, led by William McConnell, camped near what is now McConnell Springs on a branch of Elkhorn Creek. Upon hearing of the colonists’ victory at Lexington, Massachusetts, on April 19, 1775, they named their campsite Lexington to commemorate the first battle of the American Revolution.

This spontaneous act of naming represents something I never encountered in my South Carolina Revolutionary War education: the immediate, emotional response of frontier settlers to distant events that they understood as fundamentally connected to their own struggle for freedom and self-governance. In South Carolina, our Revolutionary history was rooted in the soil where battles were fought. In Kentucky, Revolutionary history was carried in the hearts and minds of settlers who had never seen Massachusetts but understood themselves to be part of the same cause.

A group of hunters on the frontier named their campsite Lexington when they heard news of the battle in June. It eventually became the city of Lexington, Kentucky. The choice to honor the Massachusetts patriots by adopting their town’s name demonstrates how the revolutionary cause transcended geographical boundaries, creating a shared identity among colonists from Massachusetts Bay to the Kentucky wilderness—an identity that could exist without the immediate presence of British troops or military conflict.

The men who made this fateful decision were part of the generation that would transform the American frontier. Impressed with the area, they hoped to see a town here some day. Their vision would be realized, but not without struggle. Due to danger of Indian attacks, permanent settlement was delayed for four years. In 1779 Colonel Robert Patterson and 25 companions came from Fort Harrod and erected a blockhouse at present Main and Mill streets. Cabins and stockade were soon built, making fort a place of importance.

Understanding Revolutionary War Complexity Through Two State Perspectives

Living in Kentucky after growing up in South Carolina has given me a more nuanced understanding of how the Revolutionary War affected different regions in dramatically different ways. In South Carolina, the Revolution was a brutal civil war that divided families, destroyed property, and left lasting scars on the landscape. British forces occupied Charleston, Loyalist militias fought Patriot neighbors, and the aftermath involved years of reconciliation and rebuilding.

Kentucky’s Revolutionary experience was markedly different but no less significant. Here, the Revolution was about the promise of what America could become rather than the immediate destruction of what America had been. The Revolutionary War in Kentucky was about defending new settlements, protecting westward expansion, and ensuring that revolutionary ideals could take root in territories far from the original thirteen colonies.

The connection between Lexington’s founders and the broader Revolutionary War effort was not merely symbolic. It is known that several of these original settlers (perhaps many of them) served under General George Rogers Clark in the Illinois campaign (also called the Northwestern campaign) against the British in 1778–79. These men had not only heard about the Revolution—they had fought in it, carrying the revolutionary spirit into the Kentucky wilderness through their own military service. This represents a different model of Revolutionary participation than what I learned about in South Carolina, where the war came to communities rather than communities forming around Revolutionary ideals.

From Frontier Outpost to Kentucky’s Athens: A Personal Discovery

The transformation of McConnell’s campsite into a thriving community reflects the broader story of American expansion and the gradual fulfillment of revolutionary ideals. Moving to Lexington, I’ve been struck by how the city’s development reflects a more optimistic vision of Revolutionary potential than what I experienced growing up amid South Carolina’s more conflicted Revolutionary legacy.

The town of Lexington was established on May 6, 1782, by act of Va. Gen. Assembly. By this time, the settlement had evolved from a vulnerable frontier outpost into Fort Lexington, protected by fortifications against potential attacks from British-allied Native American forces. But unlike the fortifications I knew from South Carolina—built primarily to withstand British or Loyalist attacks—Kentucky’s fortifications were built to protect Revolutionary expansion rather than to defend against Revolutionary enemies.

On January 25, 1780, 45 original settlers signed the Lexington Compact, known also as the “Articles of Agreement, made by the inhabitants of the town of Lexington, in the County of Kentucky.” This compact represented an early exercise in democratic self-governance that resonates differently when viewed from a Kentucky perspective than from a South Carolina one. In South Carolina, Revolutionary governance emerged from the destruction of existing British colonial structures. In Kentucky, Revolutionary governance was built from scratch by people who deliberately chose to organize their community around democratic principles.

The Articles allocated land by granting “In” lots of 1/2 acre to each share, along with “Out” lots of 5 acres for each share. This careful division of land reflected both practical concerns about defense and farming, and philosophical commitments to equitable distribution of opportunity. Living here now, I appreciate how this represents a different kind of Revolutionary achievement than the military victories I learned about in South Carolina—this was Revolutionary idealism translated into practical community building.

Kentucky’s Revolutionary War: A Different Kind of Battlefield

My understanding of Revolutionary War strategy was shaped by South Carolina experiences of conventional battles, guerrilla warfare, and the complex loyalties of a divided population. Kentucky’s Revolutionary War story has taught me about different kinds of strategic thinking and different forms of Revolutionary commitment.

Kentucky’s role in the Revolutionary War extended far beyond symbolic naming. The region became a crucial theater of conflict as British prosecution of the war fell on the shoulders of Lt. Col. Henry Hamilton, the lieutenant governor at Detroit. Hamilton’s main responsibility involved maintaining control of the Ohio River Valley and Canada. The frontier warfare that ensued would test the resolve of Kentucky’s early settlers and determine whether Revolutionary ideals could take root in the western territories.

In March 1777, the Shawnee war chief Blackfish led a force of 200 warriors into Kentucky. Beginning in April, Blackfish struck at Harrodsburg and St. Asaph’s. Rather than launch full scale assaults, the warriors focused their attention on the destruction of crops, animals, and foodstuffs to compel the Americans to abandon Kentucky. This strategy of economic warfare threatened the very survival of settlements like Lexington, making every harvest a victory for the Revolutionary cause.

Coming from South Carolina, where Revolutionary warfare often involved direct military confrontation, I’ve found Kentucky’s Revolutionary experience illuminating in its focus on persistence, community building, and the defense of settlement rather than territory. The successful defense of Kentucky settlements required both military courage and political support from Virginia. Virginia governor Patrick Henry kept a close eye on the operations in Kentucky. He annexed the territory as a county of Virginia in 1776 and supplied the colonists with munitions.

Personal Reflections on Revolutionary Legacy and Statehood

The path from frontier outpost to statehood reflects the gradual expansion of Revolutionary principles across the American continent in ways that my South Carolina upbringing didn’t fully prepare me to understand. Once a part of Virginia, Lexington was granted 710 acres by the Virginia General Assembly in 1782. Ten years later, Virginia released Kentucky, and it assumed statehood, making Frankfort its state capital. Kentucky officially became the fifteenth state in the Union on June 1, 1792.

Living in Kentucky during this anniversary year, I’ve come to appreciate how this transition represented more than administrative reorganization—it embodied the Revolutionary promise that American territories could evolve into equal partners in the federal union. It marked a major moment for the nation’s early growth and expansion because Kentucky also became the first state west of the Appalachian Mountains. Kentucky’s admission established a precedent for westward expansion that would eventually extend the United States from Atlantic to Pacific.

This perspective on Revolutionary legacy differs significantly from what I absorbed growing up in South Carolina, where the Revolution’s legacy was often about recovering from destruction and rebuilding what had been lost. In Kentucky, the Revolutionary legacy was about building something entirely new—communities, institutions, and eventually a state that had never existed before.

The process of achieving statehood revealed both the promise and complexity of Revolutionary ideals. By the early 1780s, survival of the Kentucky settlements, so uncertain only a few years earlier, was assured. The end of the American Revolution curtailed British support for Indian raids, and thousands of settlers sought a better life in the “Eden of the West.” Yet while most Kentuckians favored separation, they differed over how and when and on what terms it should occur.

The Lafayette Connection: International Revolutionary Brotherhood

Growing up in South Carolina, I learned about Lafayette primarily through his military service in major battles. Living in Kentucky has introduced me to a different dimension of Lafayette’s American legacy—his role as an international symbol of Revolutionary ideals that could inspire community naming and institutional development.

Fayette County was named in honor of Marquis de Lafayette, France’s largest supporter of the American Revolution in 1780. This naming choice reflects the global dimensions of the Revolutionary cause and the gratitude Americans felt toward their French allies. But unlike the Lafayette connections I knew from South Carolina battlefields, Kentucky’s Lafayette connection is about inspiration and aspiration rather than military cooperation.

Recently, the Kentucky Society of Daughters of the American Revolution toured the city to celebrate three newly-dedicated historical markers on the ‘Lafayette Trail,’ which honors French military officer Marquis de Lafayette’s visits two centuries ago. These markers underscore the enduring connections between Revolutionary history and contemporary civic engagement, as organizations like the DAR work to preserve and commemorate the international friendships forged during America’s founding struggle.

“Each little town has its own story and connection to Lafayette,” explained Julien Icher of France, founder and president of the Lafayette Trail. “In Lexington, we have Fayette County, we have Transylvania University, we have the home of Henry Clay, we have the Masonic connection—there are so many connections, we could go so many different directions with Lafayette.” These multiple layers of connection demonstrate how Revolutionary ideals became embedded in Kentucky’s institutional and cultural fabric in ways that differ from but complement the military legacy I knew from South Carolina.

Discovering Revolutionary Idealism in Institutional Development

Moving to Kentucky has given me new appreciation for how Revolutionary ideals influenced the development of educational and religious institutions in ways that my South Carolina experience didn’t emphasize. The Revolutionary spirit that inspired Lexington’s naming continued to shape the city’s development throughout its history in directions that reflect optimism about democratic potential rather than recovery from conflict.

The establishment of Transylvania University in 1780—originally Transylvania Seminary—created an educational institution dedicated to Enlightenment learning and democratic values. The university’s connections to Lafayette and other Revolutionary figures helped establish Lexington as a center of learning and culture in the early American West. Growing up in South Carolina, where many educational institutions had to be rebuilt after Revolutionary War destruction, I find Kentucky’s story of building educational excellence from scratch to be both inspiring and instructive.

Around 1790, the First African Baptist Church was founded in Lexington by Peter Durrett, a Baptist preacher and slave held by Joseph Craig. Durrett had helped guide “The Travelling Church” on its trek to Kentucky. This church is the oldest black Baptist congregation in Kentucky and the third-oldest in the United States. The establishment of this congregation reveals both the contradictions and possibilities within Revolutionary ideals, as enslaved Americans created their own institutions of freedom and community even within systems of oppression.

Coming from South Carolina, where the Revolutionary War’s relationship to slavery was often discussed in terms of conflict and contradiction, I find Kentucky’s early African American church development to be a powerful example of how Revolutionary ideals could inspire institution-building even under oppressive circumstances.

Contemporary Celebrations: Connecting Past and Present

As Lexington prepares to commemorate these dual anniversaries, living here during this milestone year has given me new perspective on how Revolutionary ideals can inspire contemporary civic engagement. City officials and community leaders are busy preparing for a celebration in 2025 that will mark 250 years since Lexington’s founding. The Mayor’s 250 Lex Commission is planning an entire year’s worth of events honoring the cultural and historic significance of our past, present and future.

These celebrations offer opportunities to explore how the Revolutionary spirit that inspired Lexington’s naming continues to influence American democracy and community life. The choice to honor both the Battle of Lexington and Concord and Kentucky’s statehood recognizes that the Revolutionary War was not merely a historical event but an ongoing process of expanding liberty and self-governance across the American continent.

Having grown up in South Carolina, where Revolutionary commemorations often focused on specific battles and military heroism, I find Kentucky’s approach to Revolutionary commemoration refreshingly focused on democratic ideals, community building, and the expansion of opportunity. This difference in commemorative emphasis reflects different regional experiences of the Revolution but also different understandings of what Revolutionary legacy means for contemporary Americans.

Lessons for Contemporary Democracy: A Bi-State Perspective

Living in Kentucky after growing up in South Carolina has given me a unique perspective on how Revolutionary War history can inform contemporary democratic participation. The story of Lexington, Kentucky, offers valuable insights for contemporary Americans grappling with questions about democratic participation, community building, and national identity that complement but differ from the lessons I learned from South Carolina’s Revolutionary experience.

The decision by frontier settlers to name their settlement after a Revolutionary battlefield demonstrates how shared ideals can unite diverse communities across vast distances. This lesson about ideological solidarity differs from South Carolina’s Revolutionary lessons about military courage and resistance to tyranny, but both are essential components of democratic citizenship.

The successful evolution from frontier outpost to thriving city shows how democratic institutions can take root in challenging circumstances when citizens commit to mutual cooperation and civic engagement. This lesson about institution-building complements South Carolina’s lessons about defending democratic institutions against external attack.

The connections between Lexington, Massachusetts, and Lexington, Kentucky, also illustrate how American democracy has always been both local and national in character. The Revolutionary ideals proclaimed at Lexington and Concord found practical expression in Kentucky’s frontier settlements, county organizations, and eventual statehood. This process of expanding democratic participation from established communities to new territories became a defining feature of American development that my South Carolina upbringing, focused on defending established communities, didn’t fully emphasize.

Conclusion: A Personal Journey Through Revolutionary America

The 250th anniversary of the Battles of Lexington and Concord and the 233rd anniversary of Kentucky statehood remind me that the American Revolution was not confined to a single time or place but represented an expanding commitment to democratic ideals that could take root in very different regional contexts. The spontaneous decision by Kentucky frontiersmen to name their settlement after a Massachusetts battlefield created an enduring bond between two communities separated by hundreds of miles but united by shared principles.

From my perspective as someone who grew up with South Carolina’s Revolutionary legacy and now lives amid Kentucky’s Revolutionary legacy, I’ve come to appreciate how the Revolution was simultaneously a military conflict, a political transformation, and a cultural movement that could inspire different forms of democratic participation in different places. In South Carolina, I learned about the courage required to defend democratic principles against direct attack. In Kentucky, I’m learning about the vision required to build democratic communities from scratch.

From McConnell Springs to Main Street, from frontier fort to thriving city, from Virginia county to American state, Lexington, Kentucky, embodies the westward expansion of Revolutionary ideals in ways that complement and extend the Revolutionary legacy I knew from South Carolina. The city’s history demonstrates how the “shot heard round the world” fired at Lexington and Concord in 1775 continued to reverberate across the American frontier, inspiring new communities to embrace the principles of liberty and self-governance.

As I participate in Lexington, Kentucky’s milestone anniversary celebrations, I find myself appreciating how this city serves as a living testament to the enduring power of Revolutionary ideals to inspire civic engagement, community building, and democratic participation. The connections between these two Lexingtons—one in Massachusetts, one in Kentucky—remind me that American democracy is not a finished product but an ongoing experiment that requires each generation to renew its commitment to revolutionary principles in ways appropriate to their own time and place.

In celebrating both the battles that began the Revolution and the statehood that extended Revolutionary principles westward, Lexington, Kentucky, honors not just historical events but the continuing responsibility of American citizens to preserve and expand democratic ideals. Living here during this anniversary year, I’ve gained new appreciation for how Revolutionary spirit can manifest differently in different places while serving the same fundamental cause. The Revolutionary spirit that inspired the naming of this Kentucky city continues to call contemporary Americans to build communities worthy of the sacrifices made at Lexington and Concord 250 years ago—and at Kings Mountain and Cowpens, too.

---

For more information about Lexington, Kentucky’s Revolutionary War connections and statehood celebrations, visit the Kentucky Historical Society, the Lexington History Museum, and the official 250 Lex Commission website. Explore both South Carolina’s and Kentucky’s Revolutionary sites to gain a fuller understanding of how the Revolution shaped different regions in different but complementary ways.